dogsmilk wrote:
Correct.

The only laws we need to abide by at the end of the day are common sense.
Treat others as you would have them treat you.
Simples

The rest is a pile of bullshit.

dogsmilk wrote: he never answered anything straight forward.

that other british fmotl clowns(forgot name) solution was the following, hed be a benevolent dictator

say hello to the new boss, even worse than the old one.


i asked the fmotl community to walk up to a cop with a kilo of maryjuana and claim fotl, i offered money i anyone did.
predictably, noone wanted to play.

anarerchists atleast are very clear about their agenda.by definition.

fotl think its ok to drive a car uninsured on public roads.

how can anyone believe for a minute that this works?

dont they watch thing like "nightcops" on tv?

andyh wrote: try to explain that to the florida face biting canibal or to the luka magnotta guy

mikey mikey wrote:
We dont have a shudder smiliey. She didnt like one sentence i said once, next thing i know, i apparently set fire to her house, and she was ranting and raving about it on DIF. Good thing for me she soon turned her attention to I_am , so that wasnt going to ever go veras way

hadabusa wrote:
And therein you have your 90% of the conspiracy hada.
Just stupid people.

There are a few small examples of 'conspiracy' so to speak but to grand overarching domination of every aspect of our lives....YET

hadabusa wrote:
Freeman of the land is in essence a good concept , but falls down about two minutes in!

People declaring shite for shites sake.

None of us want to be goverened or play to the governement or authorities rules , but when you start try to take on the world, individually you will get fucked.

Look at Robert Green ......

That whole thing with Hollie Greig left him getting stitched up by the 'Conspiracy' people and a term in prison .

David was an adovactor for him then disappeared at the first sign of trouble

I feel sorry for Robert Green ....he was abanboned and stitched up

andyh wrote: my dad recently said "if everyone were wealthy, people would spit eachother into their faces from over balconys".

have you watched or read "american psycho"?

the authors message was the same.

there are many un honourable folks out there, and there are many insane folks out there.

anarchy might be possible in a world where everyone has plenty off everything

but the wrold is very far from that state currently.

we live in a soft time where veryone is spoiled and feels entitled to many things.

if somme people didnt get justice bc there is no law, some would take justice into own hands etc etc

hadabusa wrote:
Hads raises some good points imo. Maybe new people looking in may find it clicky !!! Perceptive hads somebody does have a blue badge

dawnbreak wrote: there was many lies brought forward by the conspiracy people in that case.

they shouted theres a pedo ring blabla with no evidence whatsoever, but when i point out hollows ehm, lets say weird behaviour here which i witnessed then i have gone to far etc.

pheony wrote:
ouch

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote: yeah, lets just say he was on the forum similiar to what a retarded kid would be irl.

and he gets excluded.

he did a racist post?so what?

ronisron thinks ernst zundel, an utter neonazi hitler admirer holcaust denier felon is a hero.zundel has a neonazi folowing.

what is worse?

perspective indeed

hadabusa wrote: Correct!
You'd be surprised how easy it would be to arrange it all.

entran­ger­mer­cen­ary wrote:
I agree, hads does raise some very good points. Very often. If only sod had too we wouldn't be many pages into a shit thread

the ONE post sod made that was a bona fide attempt at interaction was in the middle of many many rapid fire posts in a short space of time. To me that suggests his other posts were genuine conscious trolling rather than a result of something beyond his control. Although perhaps he has a very extreme form of that French phrase diagnosis that was offered by the defence in the two Swedish Girls case? The 'expert' that talked of that said it was nearly unheard of so if sod has an extreme form of it ( as in it can turn on and off in the blink of an eye), sod really must be very special indeed and warrants a study of his own.

I'm not ruling it out but for me the diagnosis is still troll

them's the breaks eh!

I don't think you could go too far on here

I know you have commeneted on the two banned members but surely even YOU can see why they were banned

As has been pointed out (with evidence) there are certain other DIF related forums that preceed this one and some people on hem have an invested interest in seeing this one do badly.

Hi estrangedmerc, miss sodlike much?

If you like, you can use your account there to inform droike and sod that people over here are being ,much nicer about them then they are being about this place.

Sod turned up declaring elsewhere that he thought the place would bomb and that he though the place was, and I quote, " a bunch of cunts".

So estrangedmerc, how about using that account over there to tell Sod he brought it on himself.

dawnbreak wrote: i wouldve handled it different.

and i wouldnt take offense at insults towards me, can ask pheony when im being insulted on the internet i sit there and laugh about it

banning=internet euthanasia programme

banning beause you dont like what someone says=hows that different to sean?

btw i dont care about specterero and sod.

hadabusa wrote:
Well Marxism is predicated on it - capitalism achieves the productive capacity that facilitates socialism - you have to go through capitalism to come out the other side. Put a spanner in those works when less economically developed countries had revolutions while advanced economies either didn't or went fascist. Though to be fair we might be living in the time right now where Marx is proved right about capitalism collapsing under its own contradictions. It's just the fallout might not be as cheery as he'd hoped for.

I see anarchism as a state of mind thing. I can't stand those guys who sit around discussing Kropotkin forever. To me it's about realising you don't really need bosses and people can achieve a lot by just working together for mutual advantage. I see it as thinking co-operatively in a dynamic way.

It's like we all need food, shelter, clothes, recreation etc - why the fuck don't we engineer things to cater for everybody's needs, but instead let half the world starve while others fly around in private jets. It makes no sense to me why we let it happen. Well it is - it's because we just accept it because we're told it's the order of things. To me it's about breaking out of those assumptions about the way things are. Maybe nothing ever changes, but it's certain nothing will unless people believe it can.

Anarchists/socialists/communists never got their way in the UK, but they helped force reform to keep people pacified. Getting the NHS, shorter working hours, union rights and all that stuff made life better for ordinary people. Then we all fell asleep and its being taken away step by step. You may never get what you're aiming for, but pushing back can be worth it if you win improvements for people. Aim high, and you'll probably get further.

mikey mikey wrote:
Ill tell him to his face mate when im having a beer with him. Droike I dont know !

hadabusa wrote:
Sorry hada but that is one hyperbole followed by an unfair comparison.

False equivalence: from wiki

dubmeup wrote: ofc hewas trolling but eventualy hed have been aproachable, at least by some.

i dont like the idea of horde belief/mob mentality where everyone different is excluded.

under the pretext of being different than sean.,no less.

i dont see how he could have damaged this forum

after all, some people here still take david ickes word for granted, why not somebody elses too?

would anyone buy a used car off of icke?