This just seemed to me like one of those clear-cut cases that didn't require a vote. I have no idea where the post is and really have no desire to look for it. It was brought to my attention a couple nights ago when a new member here screencapped it and posted it "over there". This should have been ALL that was needed to remedy the situation on the spot! I understand you guys (mods & admin) are always busy but I can't help but feel that adequate attention has already been brought to this issue and the ball has been dropped.

I do however think that the new member in question was totally lacking in decency by not bringing it to the attention of the admin team HERE before posting it over there, effectively being no better than the person that posted the garbage to begin with.

phemohilia wrote:
In all fairness, bluegrazz did give us that option, however i was busy at the time with other site issues.

Im still disappointed in what he did, because in my mind i was removing posts that were, lets face it, labelling specific persons as being sympathetic to pedophilia...and it came back to bite me. funny about that.

i can only assume he took issue with his posts being removed...they were only removed because they were quoting and responding to the post that we wanted removed.

I know you drew attention to the same topic being brought up in their rumors thread over there, but there is a difference...that post was not stating that specific people were condoning pedophilia whereas the ones here were.

as for the screenshot itself, i went to have a look but it had already been deleted over there.

I take no issue with what you were doing. I understand that there were other posts needing attention and you're only one person with two hands! I think it was the new member's itchy trigger finger that prompted their joining up here in the first place, or so it would seem. Right out of the gate and they were already trying to incite trouble. I'm sure they'll say otherwise but actions speak louder than words. I'm disappointed that I was wrong about their character. Live & Learn.

I'm not angry with you novum nor do I feel any animosity towards the rest of the admin team. I just want this place to continue to function with the same seamless, forward-moving energy by which it was started, as I'm sure others will agree. We've got a really good thing going here and I just don't ever want to see our waters muddied with actions that are far beneath us. I really don't think that kind of element would see a need to linger here as they cannot thrive in such an open, honest and forthright environment.

phemohilia wrote:
As ever, eloquent and to the point ... and more importantly, fully understood. Thank you

I don't understand where all the 'trouble making is coming from?

Life is too short for forum wars .....

However there seem's to be more coming over here and causing trouble than vice versa.

There are many people here who do not want a forum war yet feel empeled to say our piece because it when some attacks you and your friends (online) you want to defend yourself and them.

This is not an ANti david icke forum

Sean mate you have a lot to answer to because essential it's you that's created this whole forum war thing.......I hope you feel happy.....I hope you feel proud that you banned people for no reason..........It's mainly down to you mate that this situation arose ....and I'm sure you know that .

Perhaps you smoked to much acyanasha in Peru when you and David went over there last month

And for what it worth Sean ......if you read this .......I do think it is you who should apologising

Tell me why I was banned , or Silverwand was banned or Thoreau was banned or why you pushed Irresprisble into a situation he asked to banned

I thought I'd moved past it and it didn't bother me but obviously it still does because you are mis representing people here and in your own forum

What's the point in fighting each other we are all on the same side

novum wrote:
No, this thread is not only about my questions regarding deleting and closing threads but any concerns that relate to forums.
Please don't limit us what we want to say.

Well, the thread Rumours about the David Icke Forum has been closed again. It was closed 2 day ago and reopened ….not for too long though. I didn’t have a chance to respond to Nirvana’s post who has brought a very important issue about pyramid structure and manipulation. I would like to discuss it. Indeed I have found on all conspiracy forums manipulation and control by a few who are on the top of a pyramid. With manipulation goes censorship.

I don't think you'll find any pyrimad of power here ftil.


It's all done in a community way .....everyone gets a say

ftil wrote:

Just to cement what dawn just said, there's no pyramid power shit happening around here. Different ballgame altogether girl. We ALL make the decisions and this was agreed on back when we first put this together.

Starting a thread on the things you wish to discuss would make more sense than opening that thread as the general consensus is that it's run it's course.

I'll also say while I'm here, I don't believe novum was trying to limit what you or anyone else was saying, he was merely being courteous seeing as it was your thread.

psketti wrote:
LOL! Did you ask nirvana if she wanted to close the thread? You didn't ask me.
Well, I guess we have a very different understanding what control means. Novum didn’t ask me but he tried to control the run of this thread.
So, we are still in the same place where we have started….

ftil wrote:
Actually no

But to be fair, that thread was more centered around the members who had been here for a while and had experienced all the recent DI shit... and as they have expressed many times throughout the thread, they just wanted it shut as they're sick of the DIF and all the crap that's happened.

I merely did what they asked, nothing more

You can call it control, censorship, heavy moderation, pyramid power... whatever - but it will STILL equate to nothing more than a majority voice asking for a decision to be made. If you insist, I could ask those who asked for it to be closed if they'd consider opening it again so you can have your say... just say the word.

I can't see what your issue is to be honest seeing as you can very easily start a thread with your questions. You need to lighten up and enjoy

psketti wrote:
I enjoy and have good laughter here. I don’t take conspiracy forums seriously any more. How could I if I see the same methods and many empty promises…….

BTW, there were only a few members who wanted to close the thread. Yes, they have been for a while and I bet that they had a plenty of opportunity to express their frustrations. But why they can’t let newcomers be free to do so. Are they obliged to read that thread?
No, they have a free choice and they don’t need to go there…….but they have a burning desire.
How do we call it…CONTROL.
Don’t you think that people can’t see it????

ftil wrote:
Do you want a visible vote?

ftil wrote:
Ok girl, here's how I see it... and I mean ME and fuck all to do with me being a mod.

Since you arrived you've been on the defensive and insist on pulling up any little negative detail that you can find. You've been asked to go and have a browse about to get the feel of the place yet this appears to not have happened or we wouldn't be here now... unless of course you where extremely obtuse and just didn't 'get it'... if that's the case, this is a lost cause and I'm wasting my time.

Do yourself a favour and read some of the forum instead of trying to find a fault.

I'm not spending my evenings running around the forum behind your ass answering questions that wouldn't need answered if you'd take the friendly advice you've been given.

andyh wrote:
LOL! How come I didn't vote?........I didn't want to see a vote of a few......who suffer anxiety...

Well I've kicked it off with a vote. If its just a 'few' then there should easily be way more 'no' votes.

I've suggested just reopening that thread andy... for those that feel they've missed something

psketti wrote:
Thats what the votes for innit.

psketti wrote:
I am glad that you stop running after me……I may get some freedom then.

Second, I have not been on defense…don’t project your issues upon me. I haveopened this thread because my posts were deleted and the thread was closed. I don’t pull little details……… but if you think that violating freedom is a little detail that a different story.
I have read several threads and I am not a quick to make a judgment. But being on conspiracy forums gave me lot’s of knowledge about many different ways to stop, suppress, or simply control.

I have bad news for you……I am not the only one.

ftil wrote:
sanctumzone.co.uk/info/terms-and-policy-...ity-guide-lines.html

Did you read it?