This the reason for my first suspension .I asked about the Greg lance watkins case .The thread was taken down straight away and i was suspended. When i was allowed back i was told any mention of Greg lance watkins and i would have a life time ban.

This was the time david icke was collecting donations to fight his court case which was hushed up. The bottom line he called publicly Greg lance watkins a paedo and greg took him to court.


www.infinite-love-forum.com/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=3952

andyh wrote:
I think we should make that a stock response.

The problem is we have all had our chance to vent which many of the new members haven't. I personally think we need to bear that in mind it's a relief for some people to final get rid of the baggage.

Frog wrote:
True.

We need a couple of links to point them towards for venting then, try and keep it all in one(or two) places.

oioioi wrote:
And chat, in fact the new chats even better as there's instant pm's, there's np with having a good whine in there I reckon

Thanks for the link nirvana interesting reading - also good to finally know exactly how far and on what topics things were 'hushed up'

I think you guys should just make a sticky titled, something along the lines of "Why did you leave the DIF? Tell your story here.".

Problem solved, contained and concentrated.

badfish wrote:
I agree. Just that one little area that lets people get it all out instead of here and there all over the forums.

badfish wrote:
That would be fun. Do you want to start?

badfish wrote:
Already been discussed in priv.

andyh wrote:
You mean private? Why not make is open. Why don't we break a pattern of secrecy. BTW, yesterday, I read what I_am sarcastically commented that people who visited this forum didn't "get a juice" as there is a subforum only for a few to access it. Is it true?

Suppose I do moan abit just needed to vent that . But yes I got threatend on a number of cases if I did anymore threads or pm anyone that info I would be banned for life .

Right thats off me chest can move on now.

Ps
sorry sean but you can not delete this.

ftil wrote:
We'd like to make the forum just 100% public, chat with frog/nov about it.

ftil wrote:
On the "few to access it " part, no. But yes there is a members only forum.

I cant recall exactly what I_am said over there, but i will say that I_am doesnt know how many people have access, even if she herself had access to the members forum, she wouldnt know the numbers that do. Only myself and Frog know the percentages. Before seans latest stunt/thread that brang a large amount of new members here which havent been added yet, at last count around 90% of the members had access. Most new members are added when we have time to add them and get around to it. The admin here have been busy installing a new chat system among other things the last few days, right when this large influx of new members arrived thanks to seans thread devoted to little old us over there.

Its not exactly a secret society and i will say more next. Even one dual member (here and DIF) that was critical of this forum in that thread over there, and had a bit of an epic battle here with members (before apologising)... has access, and did from the start.
ftil wrote:
It was made as an attempt to basically keep out trolls/troublemakers and those with prying eyes whos sole intentions for reading was to ban our members from other sites. It was also made as a place for the community to discuss issues relating to site direction and so on, without prying eyes.

Just as the DIF has a hidden moderator section where they can discuss issues, we too have a section to talk about the direction of the site and other issues away from prying eyes...but where members who arent trolls can also be invited.

There really wasnt a strict policy for adding new members despite the rumors. Basically if you werent a troll and we knew a little bit about you, you were in.

The situation and system for adding new members as they arrive is being reviewed at the moment, its been on the cards for a while but this latest large increase in membership has been a catalyst for the review that is currently underway.

I hope that answers yours and other peoples questions sufficiently.