www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taib...ort-selling-20120515


'Last week, in response to an Overstock.com motion to unseal certain documents, the banks’ lawyers, apparently accidentally, filed an unredacted version of Overstock’s motion as an exhibit in their declaration of opposition to that motion. In doing so, they inadvertently entered into the public record a sort of greatest-hits selection of the very material they’ve been fighting for years to keep sealed.'


Link to the document:

media.economist.com/sites/default/files/...20Opp%20to%20MSJ.pdf

I say thank you girl and mean it.... but not really


Last time (which wasn't that long ago), I read an accidently released file it fucked with my head and still does.

Will have to look at this one too just because I don't know how to ignore it

Not tonight though.

psketti wrote:
Very wise sketters. You need to get your 'filter' checked, girl.

Ab Origine wrote:
I'll take that as advice

psketti wrote:
As it was intended. Inhaling too much at once will make you sick. You, of all people, should know that.



If you really must pay so much attention to all of it, then little and often may help.

Edit: I speak from experience, by the by.

Ab Origine wrote:
I find it near impossible to not pay attention to some types of things.

But yes, I hear what you're saying. Listenings the problem.

No problem, this is the kind of thing we should all be aware of, this is the stuff they don't want us to know.

I know what you mean about don't read too much in one go, I've not read the proper file yet, I can't face wading through it and getting angrier by the page. The article revealing that they'd accidentally released this stuff had enough highlights to get me raged enough for tonight.