Julian assange death threads

itstruck.me/swiss-artists-send-julian-as...ing-package-updated/

SWISS ARTISTS SEND JULIAN ASSANGE A SELF-PHOTOGRAPHING PACKAGE UPDATED

!
FACEBOOK IS CIA SPYING MACHINE

In A CNN Interview Vargas llosa talks against wikileaks, saying it is not necessary when Democracies exist.
Also that Assange attacks the super powers that are democratic, but never the dictatorships like Cuba and others.
Vargas llosa says he can understand that wikileaks work where there is no political order, but not where there are laws and democracy..

google translate

Vargas Llosa, Savater, and Wikileaks leaks

By Iñaki Berazaluce |
19.01.2011 |
16:24 h.

The brand new Nobel laureate Mario Vargas Llosa the undertaking from the opinion page of the country against WikiLeaks and its founder, Julian Assange, who contemptuously called "the Oprah Winfrey of information". Vargas Llosa is based on the arguments of another prominent newspaper columnist, Fernando Savater, to attack Wikileaks, while the revelations of U.S. diplomatic cables, of which, incidentally, has brought much revenue the country-are irrelevant at best and at worst secret, so its dissemination can "undermine the foundations of democracy" and inflict "a severe blow to civilization."

What makes you think such distinguished thinkers (and journalists) that increased transparency can be harmful to democracy? Here (and try to dismantle) their arguments:
1. The revelations are inconsequential

Not the first time I hear this argument and it still seems extremely weak. Firstly because the embassy cables reveal something we already suspected: the two faces of the U.S. government in private and public behavior towards allies and hostile regimes. In politics, hypocrisy is supposed, now also known.

It remains curious that the same "irrelevance" of Wikileaks papers have been used as evidence by Conspiranoids otherwise: that famous roles are part of a disinformation campaign the U.S. government itself-a "false flag "in slang. There is no mention in the 250,000 documents on the "self-attack of 11-S", proof that Assange is a stooge of illegitimate interests.

The relevant question would Llosa and Savater: how relevant the information should be brought to light to consider WikiLeaks a prop and not a threat to democracy? How about the cold-blooded murder of ten unarmed civilians in Iraq and the military executors gloating? Do not forget that the latest leak is just one of many that I have undertaken the organization of Assange. Would Vargas Llosa, as fan as the Great Journalism, willing to "pardon" if Wikileaks unveiled a corruption case comparable to Watergate?
2. To make democracy work requires some confidential communications.

The allusion to Watergate is not innocent, of course. The argument could have used wields Llosa Nixon in 1974, when he was forced to resign after revelations of the Washington Post about the welter of illegal activities carried out by the President's Men. On that occasion, an anonymous informant Deep Throat, the famous pan-started reporters the evidence implicating Nixon and his henchmen in behaviors incompatible with democracy.

Were Bernstein and Woodward about "Oprah Winfrey of information" by exposing confidential documents clearly? Surely not for or Savater Llosa. They were practicing great journalism and, therefore, are deserving of the Pulitzer Prize and the recognition of the Democrats.

But in the nearly four decades between Watergate and Wikileaks a lot has changed in journalism. For starters, communication is now tightly controlled by press offices, both in government and in companies that conceive of a type of communication: vertical, unidirectional and always focused on generating a reality-the "storytelling" - to save the face of the institution and its leaders. No less than 80% of the content of the newspaper every day, 100% in the case of magazines, has been written and shaped by news agencies and news agencies, each paying the salary of his. Journalism in this context is a pipe dream.

Wikileaks is the penultimate round in the arms race between the powers, to hide the truth (now with "comprehensive communication policy") and citizens to meet her. Citizens, yes, and not "the Internet" as incorrectly stated the Nobel Prize: The Wikileaks used the Internet because it is the only free and uncontrolled dissemination of existing but have benefited both Internet users (64% of the population Spanish) as readers of El Pais, The Guardian and The New York Times.

Savater and Llosa should bear in mind that journalism is "what someone does not want to know" as an expression lucky professional colleague. That does not mean that everything that does not know someone who should be published (eg should interest anyone hobbies alcove of the writers, yours or my own), but it is more powerful than you know their behaviors can be tested for citizenship, so they are forced to be more decent in their behavior and less hypocritical public and private sectors.

Monday, January 21, 2013
WikiLeaks reveals that Reddit co-founder could have been one of their sources
More Sharing ServicesOtros
About the author:
Emol.
WikiLeaks-revealed-to-the-founder-of-Reddit-could-have-been-one-of-its-sources

It's been only a week since he knew about the death of Aaron Swartz, and now is another matter outside his trial is striking. The group WikiLeaks said the 26 year old kept constant communication with the same Julian Assange, founder of the site, one of the reasons why you believe it would have been one of his sources.

WikiLeaks documents reveal charge of government and other institutions, is maintained by the anonymous contributions of different people. According to the organization's spokesman, Kristinn Hrafnsson, Swartz allegedly participated with them. The reasons behind this assumption would be based, first, on the time that the young openly helped WikiLeaks and communication he had with Assange in 2010 and 2011.

However, the organization explained in turn that has no way to prove this connection as they are not trained to provide the identities of their informants.

So far Swartz participation and the reasons behind his suicide remain the subject of speculation by people close to the young. Some rumors even suggest that the Department of Justice and the Secret Service would have had more reason to pursue the technology expert based on their involvement with the organization of Assange.

Before his death, the co-founder of Reddit also held a trial with American justice by the discharge of 4.8 million reviews and academic papers and publications protected by copyright. One of the actions is speculated, could also have been related to his death.

filmguide.sundance.org/film/13040/we_ste...e_story_of_wikileaks

Julian Assange criticizes Wikileaks film
Propaganda immense
Julian Assange Wikileaks film criticism
1 comments GACETA.ES

The founder of the organization considers Dreamsworks has spent millions of dollars just to fan the flames of war against Iran.

Julian Assange has said that the Hollywood movie, The Fifth Estate, which tells the story of Wikileaks, is a "huge propaganda attack against the organization" and Dreamworks, the producer behind the project, is spending millions of dollars only to fan the flames of war against Iran.

The film features Benedict Cumberbatch, actor who starred in 'Holmes', who will play Julian Assange and Daniel Brühl in Spanish as one of his top aides.

Julian Assange's criticism of the film, which chronicles the early days of the organization, and how they attempted to transport confidential data wine given through a videoconference with the Oxford Union, which offered from the Embassy of Ecuador offered him political asylum.

"This is one lie after another. A gigantic attack Wikileaks and its employees," said its founder.

Fifth Estate's director, Bill Condon, has said that, just after the passage of decades, the world will realize the full impact of Wikileaks and how it has become data dissemination. According to Condon, the proposal aims to examine the difficulties and challenges of transparency in the information age.

www.oxford-union.org/term_events/julian_assange2










Sam Adams Awards incl videolink with Julian Assange


Event name: Sam Adams Awards incl videolink with Julian Assange
Start date: 23/01/2013 19:30
End date: --/--/-- --:--
Duration: N/A

Description

Sam Adams Awards

The Sam Adams Associates for Integrity in Intelligence confers an award each year to a person exemplifying the courage, persistence and devotion to the truth of CIA analyst Sam Adams. Many distinguished past award winners include prominent whistleblowers and former intelligence agents



Adams_AwardsThomas Fingar will be recognised for the role he played with the National Intelligence Estimate which helped prevent the Bush/Cheney administration from launching war against Iran in 2008

Coleen Rowley retired from the FBI, having spent twenty-four years with the agency, after bravely revealing its mishandling of information relating to 9/11

Annie Machon, a former MI5 officer, was forced to go into exile and hiding in Europe for many years after blowing the whistle on criminal activities in the organisation

Ann Wright was one of only three US State Department officials to resign over the 2003 invasion of Iraq

Also featured are Jesselyn Radack, Ray McGovern and Thomas Drake, with a videolink appearance by Julian Assange





AssangeKnown worldwide as the founder and public face of WikiLeaks, Julian Assange has made headlines across the world by exposing government misconduct. He has championed the principle of freedom of information, yet some have criticised his activities as reckless and dangerous. Under Assange’s leadership, WikiLeaks has published innumerable classified diplomatic cables and played a crucial role in shaping the international political landscape. He is currently living as a fugitive in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London

(Via Exclusive Live Videolink)

Julian Assange to run for Senate

AAP
January 30, 2013 8:41PM



WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange will run for a Senate seat, a tweet from the infamous website says. Source: AAP

Start of sidebar. Skip to end of sidebar.

End of sidebar. Return to start of sidebar.

JULIAN Assange will run for a Senate seat in the 2013 federal election and his mum reckons he'll be awesome.

Christine Assange confirmed her son's candidacy on Wednesday after WikiLeaks tweeted the news.

"He will be awesome," she told AAP.

"In the House of Representatives we get to choose between US lackey party number one and US lackey party number two - between the major parties.

"So it will be great to 'Assange" the Senate for some Aussie oversight."

Queensland-born Assange, who founded the secret-leaking website WikiLeaks, announced his Senate ambition last December from Ecuador's London embassy.

He sought refuge there last June in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden.

Mr Assange fears if he goes to Sweden to be questioned over rape allegations, authorities will allow him to be extradited to the US to be questioned over WikiLeaks' release of thousands of US diplomatic cables.

He said last year he would run as a Senate candidate under a yet-to-be-formed WikiLeaks party banner and was recruiting others to stand with him.

The election will be held on September 14.

gegen-kapital-und-nation.org/en/wikileak...ecutes-its-idealists

!

www.enterthefray.org/forum/index.php?sho...ic=47364#entry883222

Brave woman. Bet there are a few Pentagon types getting out their new torture instruments as we speak.

The CIA is workingg udner cover to overthrow the Government of Presdient Correa of Ecuador.
When that happens, Julian Assange will be in their hands, which is what they have always wanted.
Hope he is able to go soon...

chandrakavi wrote:
Correa: Neo-colonial West pushes Ecuador to backtrack on Assange