Sanctum Zone

Keyword
A+ A A-
Welcome, Guest
Username: Password: Remember me
  • Page:
  • 1

TOPIC: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways

US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 06 Jun 2012 03:33 #1

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder 
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 4125
  • Thank you received: 2306
  • Karma: 0
As the United States is preparing to shift its military focus to Asia in a few years time, a university professor says he believes America is pursuing the "militarization of strategic waterways" in the region.

In an interview with the U.S. Desk on Saturday, Michel Chossudovsky, director of the Centre for Research on Globalization‏ and professor of economics at the University of Ottawa, said that east Asia is a strategic region for the U.S. and the military shift towards Asia "is essentially directed against China."

The United States will move the majority of its warships to the Asia-Pacific in coming years and keep six aircraft carriers in the region, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said on Saturday in Singapore, giving the first details of a new U.S. military strategy.

Chinese officials have been critical of the U.S. shift of military emphasis to Asia, seeing it as an attempt to fence in the country and frustrate Beijing's territorial claims.

Originally aired on PressTV, June 2, 2012

presstv.com/usdetail/244324.html

Y11
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: psketti, Coco

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 06 Jun 2012 07:58 #2

  • Coco
  • Coco's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • The jolly, candy like button!
  • Posts: 777
  • Thank you received: 383
  • Karma: 57
A HA!!!

Dammit man, I love you. I love the way you prove I am not alone in my nutty, general ideas when I first heard of this a few months ago and got shot down by my own countrymen. (just like my Yemen theory a couple of years ago - ooh! - where are we focused now?!)

I love all you guys for teaching me, by example, how to think outside the American mind-box. No doubt, I've a long way to go, but that's why I hang out with you. :)

*gloats*
"If you see your face is dirty in the mirror, do you wash the mirror?"
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: novum

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 06 Jun 2012 08:41 #3

  • novum
  • novum's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Gold Boarder 
  • Rank5
  • Posts: 4125
  • Thank you received: 2306
  • Karma: 0
Thanks Coco.

Water has become like oil now, heck "water is the new oil" was my David Icke Forum sig once upon a time.

You will find the multinational corporations like KBR (a halliburton subsidiary) , Veolia and Thames sticking their beaks in wherever they can.

Just like big oil does the same with oil.

Because water is the new oil.

They then of course lobby respective governments, like the US. Well really these corporations are the government effectively. So then what we see is US and or UK government policy that is just doing what the corporations want. Enter the military, an arm of the government. We then see wars and or invasions that are really about oil and control of other resources, and some would be and will continue to be about water.

There were many reasons for the empire to take Libya for example, control of African water was possibly one of them, on top of the most obvious reasons, which was likely oil.
Y11
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Coco

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 07 Jun 2012 02:40 #4

  • Coco
  • Coco's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • The jolly, candy like button!
  • Posts: 777
  • Thank you received: 383
  • Karma: 57
Confessions of an Economic Hitman. A good primer.

There are other titles I've run across, but not read. It's shocking, really, as to what's really going on and why.
"If you see your face is dirty in the mirror, do you wash the mirror?"
You must register to post here.
The following user(s) said Thank You: novum

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 07 Jun 2012 20:04 #5

  • Mrindigo
  • Mrindigo's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Voluntarily Inactive
  • Rank0
  • Posts: 787
  • Thank you received: 677
  • Karma: 53
Good thread topic. This is very important, and something that should be stayed on top of. I can say one thing, the Chinese won't idly hand over strategic waterways.

Chinese sub pops up in the middle of US Navy exercise
Form is merely a momentary manifestation of being, not a fixed reality.

History doesn't repeat itself, uninformed people repeat history.

To all progressive endeavors great or small, come unforeseen benefits on a scale larger than most give pause or contemplation of.
Last Edit: 07 Jun 2012 20:06 by Mrindigo.
You must register to post here.

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 14 Jun 2012 08:45 #6

  • Coco
  • Coco's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • The jolly, candy like button!
  • Posts: 777
  • Thank you received: 383
  • Karma: 57
www.atimes.com/atimes/Southeast_Asia/NF12Ae01.html

US, Vietnam inch closer together
By Lien Hoang

HO CHI MINH CITY - The United States could not have chosen a more potent location. As Defense Secretary Leon Panetta nudged Vietnam to host more US military craft, he spoke last week aboard a navy ship docked 480 kilometers north of this city, standing literally against the backdrop of the South China Sea.
In recent years, the sea has been the main setting for encounters much less diplomatic than Panetta's visit, usually pitting China against Vietnam, the Philippines, or a handful of other Southeast Asian nations. And now another player has firmly entered the fray: America.

The US has long positioned itself as a neutral bystander in the regional drama, in which six nations joust for control over the South China Sea's oil, gas, fisheries, and trade routes. But Panetta's first Asia tour colored with some detail how America intends to "pivot" towards Asia, particularly among smaller countries eyeing warily an ascendant China.

After telling a Singapore defense conference on June 2 that 60% of US warships would be based in the Pacific by 2020, Panetta stopped over in Vietnam, the only South China Sea claimant country on his itinerary. Here he said that the US would shift emphasis to Asia by working "with partners like Vietnam to be able to use harbors like this," pointing to Cam Ranh Bay, which surrounded him.

No US defense secretary had been to this southern deep-water bay, which opens into the South China Sea, since the Vietnam War. French, American, and Soviet militaries each used the port in turn, but Vietnam has barred war vessels from the facility since Russia left around a decade ago.

Now Panetta hopes to change that as one ingredient in a US recipe to build up power in a region Washington neglected while China was quintupling its military spending, according to the Associated Press. But any mention of America's rebalancing act in Asia comes with the official caveat that China should not feel threatened.

"I reject that view entirely," the Pentagon chief said in Singapore in response to the notion US moves in the region aim to counterbalance China. Panetta's reassurances, however, did little to pacify China's hawkish media, though US officials insist they only want South China Sea disputes settled by international standards to maintain freedom of navigation.

The problem, however, is that "freedom of navigation" holds different meanings for China and the US. Patrick Cronin, senior director at the Center for a New American Security's Asia-Pacific Security Program, said Washington considers the phrase a green light for offshore commercial and military activity all over the world. Beijing takes a stricter line, demanding prior approval for naval conduct in and around its claimed territory.

"This is where globalization potentially collides with geopolitics," Cronin said on June 4 at a forum on the South China Sea hosted by the Asia Society in New York.

The US is still determining the contours of its "pivot" policy towards Asia, where it's apparently determined to uphold trade and security interests without irking China. But that's difficult to do in Vietnam.

Age-old antagonism

Few other countries have had as ancient and schizophrenic a relationship with China. The middle kingdom arguably exerted the deepest historical impact on Vietnamese language, arts, politics, religion, and social tradition. Yet one would be hard-pressed to find citizens here showing solidarity with their giant northern neighbor.

While Vietnamese officials seek a pragmatic middle ground, the general public views scuffles at sea as yet another iteration of bullying from China, which ruled Vietnam for 1,000 years and fought deadly battles with it into the 1980s.

Even Panetta's host city of Cam Ranh highlighted anti-China impulses. The bay has been the subject of many recent reports in Vietnamese media complaining that Chinese fishermen masquerade as researchers to smuggle large and largely profitable fish back home.

Authorities have expelled the fishermen in an ironic reversal of Vietnam-China relations: Typically, it has been China giving the boot to Vietnamese fishermen from waters surrounding the South China Sea's Paracel and Spratly Islands, which both countries claim.

If the US has an instinctive cohort then in curbing Chinese hegemony, Vietnam is it. And all the players hold strategic cards.

From Cam Ranh Bay, Panetta flew to Hanoi where Vietnamese officials announced that they would clear US military teams to scour three new sites for MIAs from the Vietnam War. Stars and Stripes, a newspaper backed by the US Department of Defense, reported last month that commanders are pushing to wrap up MIA searches within the decade.

At the same press conference, Vietnamese defense minister Phung Quang Thanh said that if the two countries are to fully normalize relations, the US must lift its arms embargo on Vietnam. Earlier, Thanh had made similar comments previewing Panetta's visit in an interview with a Vietnamese online newspaper, when he also lamented that the US did not appropriately recognize the country's market economy.

Panetta responded not so differently from US Senators John McCain and Joseph Lieberman after they visited here in January. The defense chief repeated that the weapons ban would stay in place until Vietnam improves its human-rights record, marked by an ongoing crackdown on political dissent and religious freedoms.
The only difference now is that Vietnam is showing a little more of its hand. It may have given the US access to three new MIA search sites, but eight others remain off limits. What's more, the US needs strategically-located ports like Cam Ranh Bay to press ahead with its newly-announced modus operandi of rotating troops through the region, in place of building permanent, Cold-War-style bases.

That should be much less expensive for the world's biggest military, which is currently looking to shed nearly $500 billion in spending over the next decade, as directed by the US Congress. Subject to lawmakers' partisan wrangling in this year's budget talks, that figure could move closer to $1 trillion over the same period.

The US Defense Department's new approach also could project a much more benign America that makes friends in the region rather than obsessing with hard power. Vietnam, which prides itself in a history of ejecting foreign intruders, would not want to be seen as a pawn of the US, or, for that matter, China.

So perhaps it didn't hurt that Panetta showed up in Cam Ranh in innocuous apparel: a baseball cap, short sleeves, khakis, and sunglasses. One Vietnamese newspaper commented that Panetta looked less like a Pentagon chief and more like a retiree on a relaxing weekend at sea.

Lien Hoang is a freelance reporter covering Southeast Asia. Connect with her at Twitter.com/lienh.

(Copyright 2012 Asia Times Online (Holdings) Ltd. All rights reserved. Please contact us about sales, syndication and republishing.)
"If you see your face is dirty in the mirror, do you wash the mirror?"
You must register to post here.

Re: US Seeks Militarization of Strategic Asian Waterways 14 Jun 2012 08:57 #7

  • Coco
  • Coco's Avatar
  • ZONED OUT
  • Senior Boarder
  • Rank3
  • The jolly, candy like button!
  • Posts: 777
  • Thank you received: 383
  • Karma: 57
Hmm...

www.atimes.com/atimes/China/ND28Ad01.html

*snip*

"Territorial disputes in the South China Sea emerged in the early 1970s when it was discovered that the region could contain significant deposits of oil and natural gas. China and Vietnam were embroiled in military clashes in 1974 and 1988 and in 1992 Beijing promulgated legislation making territorial claims to the South China Sea based on historical discoveries.............."
"If you see your face is dirty in the mirror, do you wash the mirror?"
You must register to post here.
  • Page:
  • 1
Moderators: psketti, oioioi, batou
Time to create page: 0.127 seconds

Latest Members Blogs

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Prev Next

What is going on when it comes to 9-11 I…

The EPA (environmental protection agency) and OSHA took air samples in the days following September 11th, they reported that they found no excessive levels of asbestos contrary to other findings....

Read more

9-11 Eleven Years Later

9-11 Eleven Years Later

With the anniversary of September 11th literally just around the corner, unanswered questions still remain for families who lost loved ones during the tragic event, as well as from families...

Read more

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass An…

Strange Noises, Possible Link to Mass Animal Deaths

In 2008 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a series of lower court rulings that restrict the United States Navy's use of sonar in submarine detection training exercises off...

Read more

Annual Server Target

Whether its 50 cents or five dollars, your donations are appreciated and help keep this community site running so we can all continue to enjoy using it.
This target is to meet our server cost for one year, June 2020 - May 2021, in USD.
$ 340 - Target
( £ 250 GBP )
donation thermometer
donation thermometer
$ 192 - Raised
( £ 140 GBP )
donation thermometer
56%
Most Recent Donation:
$122 USD on 4th Jan 2021
Bitcoin Address: bc1q0kazqya0nurfxtunxv807vm0m8852nnrrk8mj8
 
Ethereum Address: 0xe69915c80dd75df19f438d556267e04f932f057d
 
More Info: Donation options for TZ

No one is obliged to donate, please only donate what you can afford. Even the smallest amount helps. Being an active member is a positive contribution. Thank You.

TradeZone Latest

Visitors

Today392
Yesterday2054
Week8411
Month6934
Total1168937

Your IP Address: 216.73.216.201 Your Browser and OS: Unknown - Unknown Saturday, 05 September 2026 20:06

Who Is Online

Guests : 352 guests online Members : No members online
© 2012 – 2021 Sanctum Zone | All rights reserved. This website is a place for people to express and discuss their views on the news and world events. DISCLAIMER: Please Note: Views expressed and submitted by contributors are their own personal opinions and do not necessarily reflect the views, opinions and beliefs of the Sanctum Zone website and its founder(s) , administrators , moderators , and any other website maintenance technicians, personnel and volunteers. Articles and messages posted on this website and forum are solely the opinion of their authors.

Login or Register

LOG IN

Register

User Registration
or Cancel