angelchemuel wrote:
What's up with you these days Gilly? You really do seem to have your knickers in a twist? It's not so much what you say, but the aggressive way you say it.
I get what your beef is with BT.....but hell woman, step back a bit will you...'cos you ain't no Psketti and never will be. And no, you aint no MFMIC around here....so if you want to have a go at me....do it out here in the open...not by PM.
I've never had a problem with you until recently, and you have definitely had a flip for the worst with your insults about me "pissing rainbows" was it?
Getting a bit reckless aren't you Angel? Have you been having a snifter or 3?
For a kick off, please explain WTF Skets has got to do with it?
If she was here, I expect she'd be posting her own opinions on things which may, or not, vary from mine. But she's not, and I've no idea why you're attempting to make a comparison, let alone attempting to phrase it in the style of a gangsta rapper. Having Googled your acronym, you appear to be calling me 'Multifiling Mitra Indonesia ', which is jolly cheeky of you, probably, but since I've no clue what you're on about, all I can say is that you're some random row of capital letters yourself. With a rainbow and some fairy dust hanging out of its arse.
See, this bit here,,,
angelchemuel wrote:
....so if you want to have a go at me....do it out here in the open...not by PM.
That made me giggle quite a lot.
Forget, for the moment, that (a) if I'd wanted to have a go at you, I'd have - er - had a go at you, and (b) the pissing rainbows comment was made 8 days ago, out in the open, which is what you've just claimed you want - not via PM, so you're contradicting yourself. For the benefit of anyone who might be interested, which is probably nobody, I shall explain why I giggled. And the only reason I see fit to explain is because of your attempt to twist things, oh rainbow-twinkle-fairydust-holier-than-thou-one.
I had never communicated with Angel via PM.
Then, 8 days ago, out of the blue, I received a PM from her. I believe it was while the initial BT's a Trolling Twat thread was on the go - though I can't be bothered checking back.
It was a supercillious communication, urging me to stop picking on Dubs, because of his delicacy. In reality, I was not falling out with Dubs in any way, shape or form, but simply disagreeing with his opinion. Although it rankled for someone to be attempting to tell me what to do, and trying to interfere with a conversation between myself and
my friend, I was perfectly pleasant, advising there was no need for concern, and that I do speak with Dubs via PM (i.e., he is my mate) plus I expressed doubt that he'd thank anyone for not speaking their mind in order to pander to him.
The response was along the lines of, "I know more than you do".
Mine was quite friendly, and along the lines of, "You might not"
To which I get the typically patronising & vacuous, "Whatever, Gilly, whatever".
Which pissed me off somewhat, in the arrogant disregard, the pointless and infantile attempt at one-upmanship, and the fact that it came after I'd gone to the effort of trying to placate her up till that point, going against my instinct to shoot her down in flames for her presumptious busybodying in the first place.
So naturally, I replied, "Get stuffed".
To which she responded, "Menopausal much?", and I retorted, "Up yourself much?"
So after you'd instigated a single ridiculous conversation via PM (8 days ago, mind - and the sole PM conversation we've partaken in) to then try to give the impression on the boards that I've been attacking you via PM is pathetic. And quite typical of your snide games that I referred to out in the open.
If you don't wish me to respond aggressively to you, don't come talking shite to me, Angelchemuel. It grates on my nerves.
I'd sign off with a rainbow, heart, angel, and fart a cloud of sparkles if I could be arsed, to indicate what a truly pure spirit I am.
