feather wrote:
To be fair, I also figured the apprentice's cover purely on writing style.
It would be unrealistic to believe that SZ did not have dual members who may believe the hype about SZ being anti-Icke and who may be playing a game of subterfuge in order to head off any damage to him.
Would any of us do the same if this place was perceived to be under 'attack'?
I would in a heartbeat.
The worst part of not specifying who you suspect is that the net widens and everyone ends up looking at each other suspiciously.
It's really a case of confront them and confirm or let it lie in my opinion.
[/tuppence worth]
There's a tremendous amount of a person's "energy signature" in their postings, no matter what username they are going by.
As for sean - there's still too much "power and ability" being accorded to him, in my opinion. He's bound to have many more than one "mole" here, and more to come I'd imagine; and so what? He might learn how to run a forum properly at last and see a valid low opinion of himself.
I know it must be horrible to be getting reported to the little anorak and by someone we think we know and can trust - but leaving the accusation hanging in the air does put everyone somewhat under the hammer. If the feeling that it's a particular person is certain, call him/her out in pm.
But there will surely be more here. And more to come. And do we really care what sean knows or not? Or whether we lose our accounts at DIFs where we're not free to post what we think anyway?
Too much power is being accorded to sean/Icke/DIFs as it is. I don't want to feed them any more!