wonderboy there is a flaw with your point, sorry.

you didnt calculate the costs of a plane,lol.

and the area around the buildings thatd be damaged.

the now dead jovenko, a leading dmolition expert has said the building 7 looks like a demolition, but the towers1 and 2 dont.

and there were planes which crashed before and no air force could stop them, and the logic of the issue how the speed of the planes isnt possible doesnt make sense to me, the planes absolutely looke like they were there, at whatever speed.

boywonder wrote:

hadabusa wrote:
when silverstein said his "we decided to pull it" comment, ofc it was about building 7.

hadabusa wrote:
I wait for the no planers now

wake_up_bomb wrote:
This plus 3 buildings collapsing into their own footprints, 1 of them not even hit by a plane...the whole thing is a circus act of unbelievable proportions.

We've no idea who really carried this out and I doubt we ever will.

Nice vid, boywonder. Thanks.

I like the notes underneath too re the loud bangs...again apparently this was coincidentally what some witnesses noticed on that fateful day.

Purely coincidence though...obviously.

pheony wrote:
Definitely...I'm sure I don't need to remind you all, but THIS IS NOT THE DIF! We're all grown ups here so play nice.

And how did I know you'd come up with some deliberately ignorant comment like that Hadabusa?

Read what you originally said about this topic. "After years of looking at both arguments"
Mate it took me approx 1 year to make up my mind about 9/11, so my advice to you is, if this is the best you've managed to come up with, after years of 'honestly looking' don't give up your day job mate!

Really, so your telling me that it's a plane that makes all the difference, not jet fuel. Leave me alone pal. I know a wind up merchant when I see one.

Do me a favour, learn to use spell check and keep a post like this for DIF. They like this kind of mind numbing turdball.

It's like you have walked into a kebab shop, and said to all the staff that anyone who eats meat is a c**t.

I like it here. Why? Because the vast majority of posters here are intelligent, reasonable, down to earth human beings. Why do I hate DIF? Because it's full of people like you that seem to be obsessed with starting pointless debates about 9/11.

If you honestly can't see 9/11 for what it really is, here's the perfect forum for you:

www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/community/


Sorry mods, this reply might seem like a personal attack or abuse, but pay attention, this post is a small insight into what could occur more and more frequently in the future.

If I'm out of line sorry. I'm not saying we shouldn't debate this issue, or any issue, but come on! It's like someone walking into a shoe shop and standing there all day saying shoes are crap try walking barefoot. I will kick ass until I'm told to stop, which I have been.

So I'll stop.

Leaving post

pheony wrote:
Of course he should ask questions, and never stop asking.

My apologies, I didn't realise that I had been quite so rude.

Behave yourself hada

jhado wrote:
You never have to apologise here, jhado. All viewpoints are welcome. We just need to try and keep things civil, otherwise we're no better than certain other sites that shall remain nameless...

boywonder wrote:
No worries wonderboy. You're entitled to your opinion, as is our dear hada.

And please don't leave the thread! This forum is for you to express your opinions, openly, honestly and while being as civil as possible.

Personally, I rather liked your kebab shop analogy.

Ab Origine wrote:
So did I.

Ab Origine wrote:
I was rude to Hads, he had said nothing to deserve it, and that is so unlike me.

So in this case, I felt an apology necessary, my apology is sincere, and I need to lighten up a bit.

That says it all tbh.

The 'whacko' conspiracy theories are imho actually LESS whacko than the official version...

andyh wrote:
Indeed. In fact, you'll find that theories labelled as such, usually have an element of truth about them that someone, somewhere, doesn't want you thinking too much about in my experience.

Are People supposed to tip toe around subjects because it may offend a few people

If people have something to say ..say it

If it turns into a row then so be it

Were all adults

No emotive language then, no swearing, fuck me is this a non conflict zone

daavid1 wrote:

Ab Origine wrote:
Thanks Abs!

I just knew that Had would sidestep my point about demolition. You could use a big crane and a rock attached to it ffs, then throw in the jet fuel


Fair point mate, but what can you do when people persistently tip toe around logic?

I think I need one of those swear jar thingys

boywonder wrote:

This is such an emotive subject.

On the other site I never once gave my opinion on the subject for that very reason.

Something stank about the whole event. I do think it was orchestrated in some way by the American government, what their actual role was who knows?

Even a real patriot must see the holes ?

It is sort of becoming a bit moon-landey where you have one group saying of course it happened and another group saying , no it didn't

Whatever the circumstances it's just horrible that people died